JustRandy

Yes I have but I don't believe the education causes them to be more responsible. I believe they were always responsible which is why they pursued the education. The education is not a cause, but an effect. People who are better educated tend to be more responsible people who "do the right thing" such as getting vaccinated and living a healthier lifestyle while taking less risks (wear seatbelts, helmets, etc). But that doesn't mean the vaccine is the right thing to do, it just means they BELIEVE it is the right thing to do, so they all tend to do it. Educated people aren't necessarily smarter who do more research, they're just less rebellious and more conformists. They take less risks and challenge authority less. So if the authority says to take a vaccine, they take it without question because it's their nature to conform. Less educated people tend to be less responsible or perhaps mired in poverty which is essentially a never ending emergency so maybe they never get around to the vaccine or maybe they distrust the authorities, particularly if the authority starts pushing the vaccine really hard. The harder it's pushed, the more they resist. And what explains the high vaccination rate among blacks? Are they better educated? No, but they're less rural, as opposed to Hispanics who are very rural. Urban and sububanites are more conformists because they live more communally than ruralites who are more independent. I think what it boils down to is propensity to conform and obey authority. https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/9uqg6clnvr/econTabReport.pdf But none of this is relevant to whether the vaccine is either safe or effective.

My last sentence was sarcasm. You seem to judge positions based on anything but the substance of the position. You look at motives, presentation and form, but not the substance which is the only thing that counts. That was my point.

What cut n pastes? We already established I don't have that need. The topic could be about the shape of the earth and I'd argue just as vociferously simply because I like to argue. Which is why you keep replying. Right because establishing motives is the path to truth.

Can you tell me why more unvaccinated are dying of things other than covid? NON-COVID DEATHS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkVsXOZguLg We can see that the unvaccinated group is 6660. One dose is 1157 Two doses is 5143 Can you tell me how the covid vaccine protects people from EVERY cause of death? How does it protect against accidents? Is it magic? Once you answer that question you will know why more unvaccinated are hospitalized for covid because it's the same reason more unvaccinated are hospitalized for car crashes. Can you solve the puzzle? So it's merely the case that people who choose to get vaccines are already healthy and responsible people who wouldn't have a problem with covid regardless of the vaccine. So the vaccine doesn't do anything. It may as well be a rabbit's foot or lucky charm. This isn't rocket science. You don't need to be a genius to get it. Think about people you know who are unvaccinated. Are they less healthy than the vaccinated ones? Mom is fat with heart disease and is unvaccinated. Dad is in perfect health and double vaxxed. Who would fare better with covid? Dad had covid in july 2020 (before the vax existed) and it barely affected him. It just made him tired with slight fever. He never stopped working the garden. Mom never had it. This is like the 4th or 5th time I've gone over this. I don't know why y'all can't get it. Maybe the pics will help.

Not at all. How many times have I said no one reads any of this? Oh that's right, you're not reading this lol Does it bother you knowing you are what you complain about? Would the opinion be based on reason or faith? Is it within your power to decide? If you're buying the beer. Wouldn't ridicule be flattery to the delusionals of grandeur? You seem torn whether my ego is impervious or delicate. I'd be stupid to do that.

After convos with admin and a day to think about it I no longer believe anyone has intention to censor here and it was likely just a confluence of a string of odd events that led me to have that mistaken impression. All is well, let's carry on.

First of all, that is no way to judge a position on the merits. Demeanor has nothing to do with anything. I mean, we're not selling aluminum siding here; this is life n death. Second, of course they're at ease because the entire establishment is on their side. What would they be worked up about? Actually it's not quick because they're at their wits ends. Maybe you just came along at the end of a long string of trying to be reasonable with lots of people to no avail and now they just call people stupid out of exhaustion. Dave has called me names and he's pro-vax n that. And I can't really say your implications about me have been very flattering either. You have me pegged as someone with delusions of grandeur, given to conspiracy theories which implies I'm an unhinged nut and then you pry into why I do what I do as if I'm a mental patient receiving therapy. I'm not bothered by it, I'm just pointing out how you're acting for your own benefit because if you truly believe truth is in how you present yourself then you would want to work on your presentation. You're being disingenuous because I've already addressed the "percentages" topic. You're acting like you didn't read it, nevermind careful analysis, which means you're doing what you're accusing the other side of doing. I fight those characters because, like you say, it makes their position look stupid. There is plenty bad to say of the vaccines without resorting to craziness. Some even deny the virus exists. I mean, I can't KNOW the virus exists because I can't observe it, but the evidence indicates it does so I work under that assumption. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and there is no evidence that a virus doesn't exist so it's dumb to even say that. Well, it's a topic of conversation on the internet and my intention wasn't to come here and proselytize to those who had already taken the shot, but more to establish whether people in general should. I'm not addressing those who had already had the shot in particular, or anyone in particular, so I'm not sure I'm guilty of what I'm being accused. I'm just standing on a hill shouting stuff. I can understand wanting to protect friends and family because that's what I'm trying to do. I think you haven't come to the realization that the virus isn't that scary. Kids and healthy people are practically assured to survive it. I'm pretty sure the average age of death from covid is higher than the average life expectancy in each country; I know it was that way a year ago. Anyway, it's only the elderly and unhealthy who are at risk, but that was true with the flu each year and no one went to such irrational lengths to look out for them. Sure we had flu vaccines but they weren't preached on tv each night and employers didn't require them. Suddenly all this over something that has essentially always existed. Why weren't we worried about the vulnerable back then? Were we insensitive then or irrational now? Plus, most of the people dying of covid are actually dying of secondary bacterial infections. I can say that with a degree of confidence because it's well established that something like 97% of those who died of flu in 1918 actually died of pneumonia bacteria for which they made a vaccine that still exists (in different form) to this day. I think Fauci actually participated in that study. And I can cite studies of nosocomial infections (infections from hospitals like MRSA and others) causing most or all the ICU deaths. So almost certainly the same happens with any viral respiratory illness: the viruses kills lung cells which lets the bacteria that were already in the lungs or those introduced to the lungs while in a hospital then cause an infection. It happened to me a year ago. I battled 104 temps and coughing up rotten stuff for a month. I didn't realize what it was until I figured out a virus should be gone by that time so I started antibiotics which eventually cured it. Then we had the ventilators killing people, Remdisivir is supposedly toxic, other treatments were suppressed, they sent covid patients to nursing homes which killed a lot of folks, labeled flu as covid which appeared like the flu was gone, the pcr test was turned up to 40 which labeled practically everyone as positive so if anybody died of anything it was called a covid death. The deaths were exaggerated every way possible for one reason or another to scare people because scaring people makes money. And in spite of all that effort the survival rate is still something like 99.9%. And as far as long term effects of the virus, well the vaccine doesn't help that because it doesn't prevent transmission, so everyone is going to get it eventually regardless what we do and there really is no way to protect anyone. All you can do is take additional risk to yourself, which invariably hurts those who care about you which defeats the purpose. I give you credit for making me think about things. Thanks for that.

What am I paranoid about? I don't have much faith in Freud.

The pic I have is the evidence that the post existed since I made that pic specifically for this site and never used it for any other purpose. So I know the post existed because I have the pic. It's not futile. My good friend used his asthma as reason to get the vaccine early with the seniors, but I've convinced him and he's now terrified. And then he got covid despite 2 vaccinations, so he's pissed as well. He then used my resources to convince his mother to never get the vaccine. Maybe he can have influence on the rest of his family. Also I've convinced my dad not to get the booster, which is good because I'd hate to lose my dad. It's not futile. Plus someone else may be reading this as admin pointed out. And I like bantering so even if it were futile I still had fun being futile. I've had the flu likely 30ish times in my life. I had the flu on my 1st birthday. There is zero doubt I could survive covid because I've survived respiratory illness so many times in the past. It's like walking across the room not worrying that I will break my leg. So I know for sure I could survive covid, but I don't know that I could survive the vaccine. You haven't refuted any of my points. You just blanket proclaim I'm wrong and no rebuttal is necessary. Then what's the point of a vaccine? It doesn't reduce severity either for reasons I've already explained twice. If it did reduce severity then it would also reduce susceptibility, but it does neither. Generally speaking, healthy responsible people choose to get the jab. Unhealthy irresponsible people tend to choose not to get the jab. So the differences in severity are explained by that. Otherwise why does the jab protect against accidents? Mostly it's just bantering because I don't believe anyone will read any of this. Maybe there is some element of challenging myself because maybe someone will raise a point that I haven't seen before. Or maybe it's partly philanthropic trying to get people to stop injecting carcinogens. Or maybe it's fighting big pharma and the political narrative by making people angry at it. It would probably take a lot of self reflection to really get to the root of why I do what I do. Mostly I guess it's just something I like to do. I've argued harder in the past over less. Usually if someone drops it then I drop it, so I know for sure I'm not on a crusade. I never intended to get this involved in a discussion; I just wanted to quote my prediction, pat myself on the back and be on my way. I never meant to have all this engagement with people. But they keep coming back so I keep coming back.

Are you the only one with authority to remove posts? Have some sort of glitches been ruled out? The last time I saw the post was when I made it and anything could have happened in the 5 months since then. I don't police the site to assure myself posts are not being removed. I just post and forget. If it's deleted I'd never know unless I happen to want to return to it for some reason, which is rare. It was on my mind for the past month to return to that post to pat myself on the back for a great prediction and I finally got to it yesterday hoping to check it off my mental to-do list. As good as I'd like to consider my forecasting abilities to be, I never imagined such a simple task would have turned into this. Yes I gave both threads a good search before making an allegation in the first place. I even checked my email hoping to find someone quoting it, but evidently I deleted all my notifications. The link where you keep sending me is no help because it doesn't show pics in the search results and I need to see the pic I posted to know if it's the post I'm looking for. Simply searching for "covid" doesn't narrow the search since practically every post mentions covid. The only way is to go through page by page looking for the pic, which is what I did, on both threads, but it's possible my pc didn't load the pics fast enough causing me to overlook it. I knew that was a possibility yesterday, but the 6 month hole in this thread made me believe it was more likely a batch of posts were removed. In this cancel culture era you can't fault me for jumping to conclusions based on probability. As I said, if I'm wrong then I sincerely apologize, but surely you agree that a 6 month hole looks suspicious. I re-upped the pic which is now buried, never to be seen again, and is completely inconsequential. Everyone else seems to be making a bigger deal of this than I. If you give me your word you are not censoring then that's good enough. If I thought you were censoring me I wouldn't be wasting my time. However google might compel you to censor if you want to keep appearing in searches or getting ad revenue. That's what happened to zerohedge and now they ban and censor like crazy because money talks. What would be the purpose ? Will anyone reread what was said? I feel lucky getting someone to read the drivel I'm spewing now, nevermind what was said in the past 10 pages. Over the years I've seen mods driving themselves crazy trying to keep civility and organization only to have the site close down or all their hard work get buried in history never to be seen again. It just seems like all the police work is a complete waste of time. Ok. If there is ever a problem just let me know. I don't want to be where I'm not wanted or be a bother to anyone.

How do you know? There is still a 6 month hole in this thread and at least one missing post I made last year. How can you prove posts have not been deleted? You can't prove a negative. Anyway, even if posts were being deleted it wouldn't be a conspiracy. But Twitter conspiring with the gov to delete posts is a conspiracy. And I've already admitted I could be wrong and apologized if I am. As far as I can tell, I'm the only one on this site to have admitted to being wrong about anything. For instance, Dave was correct about Trump being a conman in the 2016 election thread and I was wrong, but he can't admit when he is wrong. Everyone is wrong at times, but few can admit it. Yep, caffeine. Stimulants increase odds of heart attack. Vaccine clots the blood which also produces heart attacks. I know of 2 of them. Vaccine clotting blood is demonstrable and repeatable.... meaning you can watch it happen and repeat it over and over. Most of the time the vaccine is injected into muscle, but if it by chance finds a vein and enters the blood stream (because the nurse didn't aspirate) then it WILL clot the blood every single time, guaranteed. That's why only a limited number of people are suffering those particular problems. Whether or not the nurse hits a vein is Russian Roulette. There is no link there. To have a theory you need correlation and a proposed mechanism to explain the correlation. You have no mechanism to explain why aspirin would cause cancer. On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence that tobacco, Roundup, asbestos, and vaccines of all kinds cause cancer. Veterinarians give rabies vaccines in a leg so that the leg can be cut off if cancer develops. It's the law in the US. Cancer and vaccines is well established. How many pet owners do you think make the association of cancer to vaccines? Not many, yet the association is still well established in spite of limited reporting which speaks volumes about the dangers of vaccines. You think MIT virologists do not know that? "Cancer is a disease generally understood to take months or, more commonly, years to progress from an initial malignant transformation in a cell to development of a clinically recognized condition. Since VAERS reports of adverse events are happening primarily within the first month or even the first few days after vaccination [209], it seems likely that the acceleration of cancer progression following vaccines would be a difficult signal to recognize. Furthermore, most people do not expect cancer to be an adverse event that could be caused by a vaccine. However, as we have outlined in our paper, if the mRNA vaccinations are leading to widespread dysregulation of oncogene controls, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis, then VAERS reports should reflect an increase in reports of cancer, RELATIVE to the other vaccines. This is in fact what VAERS reports reflect, and dramatically so. Table 1 illustrates events involving the most common cancers reported to VAERS in the US, cancers either newly identified or stable disease newly progressing. It compares reports related to COVID-19 vaccination to reports related to all other vaccinations over the 31-year history of VAERS information collection. To obtain this table, we searched the online resource, http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html, for search terms indicating cancer, such as “cancer,” “carcinoma,” “mass,” “neoplasm,” etc., and summed over all hits related to a particular organ, such as “lung.” These data were collected on December 12, 2021. Notably, there were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphoma were associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations. The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in our opinion, constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation." https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas So, adverse reactions to covid vaccines is greater than 31 years of ALL other vaccines, therefore the PERCENTAGE would be magnitudes higher because the numerator of the covid reactions is greater than the numerator of all other reactions in 31 years and the denominator of all vaccines over 31 years is greater than the denominator of 1 year of covid vaccines. I know you want the vaccines to be safe but the evidence is not on your side. There is an astounding correlation of cancer to the vaccines (both in literature and anecdotally) and an articulated mechanism by which the vaccine disregulates the onco-controls and contributes to dna damage. Read the study. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. The vaccine doesn't mean you will get cancer (just like smoking, roundup, asbestos doesn't), but if you have pre-cancer then the vaccine will reduce the body's ability to prevent it from progressing to cancer. Those who have had cancer in the past definitely should not get the vaccine. Those at risk via the BRCA gene definitely should not get the vaccine. Only healthy people with minimal risk of cancer and heart disease could get the vaccine, but if they're healthy they wouldn't need a vaccine for essentially a common cold to them, not like the vaccine would prevent it anyway. The whole thing is the pinnacle of stupidity. It's all risk and zero benefit.

Twitter, Facebook, Google, youtube, and the gov are all in concerted effort to suppress any dissent. Nope. MRNA was never used outside of cancer and AIDS patients and I doubt any of them are still alive today. Nope, not enough time has passed. Safety cannot be determined for at least 5 years and the average time is about 8-10 years for FDA approval of a vaccine. "Since 2010, most novel vaccines approved by the FDA required about 8 years of clinical development and were based on evidence from a median of 7 clinical trials, including at least 2 pivotal efficacy trials that were randomized, masked, and used a comparator group" https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/review-tracks-fda-vaccineapproval-process-over-last-decade Small? More like HUGE! Notably, there were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphoma were associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas Short list of drugs with class action lawsuits https://www.classaction.com/lawsuits/drugs/ I could find longer lists if needed. Tylenol for example is a powerful liver toxin with a recommended dose about half of its LD50 (Which means 50% of animals died). Doctors routinely recommend Tylenol. I know of people who committed suicide with Tylenol, the most trusted brand of doctors. Doctors are the 3rd leading cause of death https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28186008/ The media is owned by pharma because pharma advertises with them so they don't dare challenge the narrative set by big pharma. Pharma is the biggest lobbyist to the gov. Pharma makes more money than the GDP of most countries. Who can stand up to big pharma?

I don't know how anyone could argue the vaccines make any difference. There are vastly more cases after the vaccine. If anything, it appears the vaccine is contributing to case rather than attenuating.

In consideration of these interests, DTR seeks to inform the Court that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine mandated by the OSHA ETS and described as being the one approved by the FDA, i.e., Comirnaty, is not currently available to anyone in the United States. The United States finally and reluctantly conceded this in a lawsuit DTR brought in Florida. There is no supply of Comirnaty. The only vaccines in production and available are the vaccines approved under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”). DTR files this brief to explain why the OSHA COVID-19 vaccine mandate before the Court is an illegal federal mandate to compel Americans to take an experimental vaccine. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A244/206781/20211229144437004_No 21A244 and 21A247 National Federation of Independent Business v Department of Labor Amicus Motion with Brief.pdf Is the Supreme Court fake news too??? I guess if you don't mind losing your job then you're not forced. I guess if you don't mind being lied to in order to convince you the vaccine is safe and effective against a disease with 99.9% survivability then you're not being forced. I doubt there exists even one person on the planet who wasn't coerced or bamboozled into accepting the jab. Oh, well, I guess we don't need a minimum wage then because if you don't like your wages you're free to seek other employment. Spoken like a true liberal. Nobody is forced to work for low wages lol I know 2 who died of the vaccine and zero who died of covid. Guy across the street from my friend died the very night of his 2nd jab and the wife of a friend of a friend died of a heart attack at 36 yrs old after her 2nd jab. I know people who smoked for decades. Does that mean smoking is safe? I know people who used Roundup for decades. Does that mean Roundup is safe? I know people who removed asbestos and didn't die. Does that mean asbestos is safe? As a kid I used to break thermometers and play with mercury. I'm still alive so that means mercury is safe, right? You injected a powerful carcinogen and now after only a few months you think you're safe??? Notably, there were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphoma were associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas Two sides of that coin. Influencers who died WITH covid had comorbidities. (no one dies of covid without comorbidities, so people die WITH covid, not OF covid) List of healthy people who died OF the vaccine https://thecovidblog.com/ Jab doesn't prevent infection Jab doesn't reduce severity. Jab is all risk and zero benefit. It appears as though the jab reduces severity but it's only because healthy people choose to take the jab while unhealthy people do not. As an example my mother has lots of health conditions but is terrified of the jab. My father is a model of health and is double vaxxed. Who do you think would have an easier time with covid? Dad had covid in july 2020 and it did nothing to him other than tired feeling and slight fever. He worked the garden the whole time. If he had been vaxxed you would have said it was because of the vax but the vax didn't exist back then. Jab protects against ANY cause of death, including accidents. See here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkVsXOZguLg How does a vaccine protect against accidents? The only explanation that makes sense (which is stated in the study) is the healthy responsible people choose to take the jab while unhealthy irresponsible people do not. And healthy people survive covid better than unhealthy people. The jab doesn't do anything. You may as well call me names and run away again because you still have nothing.

I would say the choices are: Get experimental mrna techology that no one knows the safety about because it's never been used before except for cancer and aids patients as a last ditch effort to save them.... and for a virus family that has never responded well to vaccines... and from an industry perpetually inundated with class action lawsuits for drugs they made in the past.... and you can't sue for damages if something goes wrong.... and the vaccine doesn't stop transmission of the virus but it does appear to make the severity of the disease less but that's only because healthier people tend to take the vaccine while unhealthy people do not (see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkVsXOZguLg Vaccine protects against ANY cause of death, including accidents, which can only mean healthy people choose the vaccine while unhealthy people do not and the vaccine doesn't confer any protection at all) which means the vaccine has no demonstrable benefit whatsoever. So you can take the jab which has no positive benefit whatsoever but carries substantial risk or you can take your chances with a disease with a 99.9% survival rate that would be higher if the controversial treatments were recognized. That presentation is the only way I'd feel ethical about giving someone that vaccine. You can only make a choice if you know all the risks and benefits. Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics and medical law that a patient should have sufficient information before making their own free decisions about their medical care. A healthcare provider is often held to have a responsibility to ensure that the consent that a patient gives is informed, and informed consent can apply to a health care intervention on a person, conducting some form of research on a person, or for disclosing a person's information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informed_consent But the information necessary to make an informed decision is being censored which means practically no one has made an informed decision. Beguiling someone into doing something they would not have done if not for the deception is a type of coercion which is very illegal in any other context.

I wouldn't either but people aren't being provided with information to make an informed decision. That information is deliberately withheld and outright censored and labeled misinformation. Plus, it's not even possible to know the safety of the vaccines because not enough time has passed, so there is no way to make an informed decision about what is best for them. The FDA approved vaccine is available all over the world, except the US. The vaccine in the US is still under emergency use authorization. Why is that? Because if it's EUA, then you can't sue. That's why they won't acknowledge treatments because if effective treatments exist then they can't have EUA by definition. The takeaway is they know they are going to be sued to oblivion without the EUA shield. It's incredible that they get away with that right under our noses.

Nobody attacking them??? What about the mandates and forced vaccinations? How is that not considered an attack? And what about loved ones being suckered into injecting a powerful carcinogen under the guise of a vaccine that doesn't even protect against a disease with near 100% survivability? We're not allowed to discuss assaults on our health without being perceived as attacking? And who is doing all the censoring? That's not an attack? People use tobacco, Roundup, and even work with asbestos for decades without developing cancer, but yet it's generally recognized those substances are carcinogenic nonetheless. So you likewise reason you can inject experimental substances (which they are because not enough time has passed to say otherwise) manufactured by an industry with an abysmal track record of safety as evidenced by the perpetual class action lawsuits on tv every night for decades and because cancer hasn't developed in a short period of months that therefore the substances are innocuous and we should all participate in the grand experiment?!? And cancer is just one adverse reaction. What about blood clots, myocarditis, and neurodegenerative disease? I can't believe you have the audacity to feel self defense is an attack. Notably, there were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphoma were associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations. The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in our opinion, constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas I know 3 people who recently developed cancer: leukemia, lymphoma, and bladder. But I'm so sorry you feel attacked.

Yep but so many posts to rifle through and most of the latest were helping Hagbard with his atv. I know I posted it because I made that jpg specifically for this site and issued warning to stock up on supplies because I knew cases would explode and logistical problems would ensue over a mandate for a jab that doesn't work. I wanted to quote myself and pat myself on the back for a good call, but I couldn't find my post to quote and figured the absence of posts from May to November indicated that the post was removed. That's surprising from my perspective. I wonder how many searching for atv help wind up on a china virus thread. I think smartphones killed forums because it's too hard to read and write long posts with a phone. Facebook and Twitter existed before smartphones yet forum participation was still robust. It wasn't until people were hobbled by their devices that they gravitated to sites that catered to such disability. Forums were slow to make the transition and were quickly antiquated. Hagbard gave it a heck of a shot. I think their mobile devices make it too hard. I really can't see a remedy.

I thought of that but didn't see my prediction post there either. Maybe I just missed it considering the size of that thread. But it appears all posts between May and November on this thread are missing. Since my prediction chart ends in august I figured it must have been deleted. Apologies if I'm in error, but a 6 month hole looks suspicious. I've never seen anyone anywhere here other than a small handful of regulars and those asking for help one time. Hagbard has made valiant effort to start interesting topics to interact with users yet nothing but crickets each time. That's why I found it unbelievable that anyone would care what is said in such a sterile environment. Freedom of speech is always inversely proportional to the size of the audience.

I don't support sites that engage in censorship so this is where it ends.

Looks like lots of posts have been deleted. Why censor a site that no one sees? Maybe admin wants even less people than the 4 semi-regulars they have now? I just came back to pat myself on the back for a correct prediction, but can't find the post where I made the prediction, so I'll re-upload the prediction: I was perfectly right! Wonder how I knew.

Cool thanks. I was dreading rummaging youtube for a good video.

Pull spark plug out. Take intake valve inspection cap off. Pull the pull cord slowly until you see the intake valve move. Then I always put a screwdriver in the spark plug hole to feel the piston while pulling on the rope to find TDC, but there is also a cap covering an inspection hole on the other side of the engine that has TDC marks. One way or the other, find TDC after the intake valve moves and that should be TDC on the compression stroke. Once you have it fairly close to TDC on the compression stoke, then just grab the rocker arm and wiggle it up and down. If there is no gap (clicking or tapping sound) then that's your problem. It's supposed to be .001 - .003. Let me know what you find.

I've never seen a bad ignition coil or cdi so it probably wouldn't be that, as you discovered. I always change plugs just because it's easy. Even if the plug is brand new. I've seen new ones not work right. It could be practically anything but if it's associated with heat it's probably electrical. If it's not associated with heat then I'd check the intake valve lash first thing. Do you know how to do that?

That only thing I can think is the regulator. Hard starting when hot is usually electrical. Try a new spark plug.